SOURCE AND GENRE
Þórodds þáttr Snorrasonar, Guðni Jónsson chs2–3; contrast Þórleifur Jónsson 1904 chs2–3
OLD NORSE
Þar var jólaveizla mikil ok samburðaröl. … Þeir mágar skyldu drekka hálf jól at hvárs þeira … Ok er kómu mið jól … inn efra hlut jólanna.
TRANSLATION
There was a large Jól feast and a shared ale gathering. The two brothers-in-law were to spend half of Jól drinking at each household. When mid-Jól arrived, Þórarr and the free people moved to his brother-in-law's to drink during the latter part of Jól.
DIRECTLY ATTESTED
In Guðni's chs. 2–3, Þórarr's feast is called jólaveizla, with samburðaröl and the surrounding village's collective drinking. Two related hosts planned a half at each house; the story explicitly uses hálf jól, mið jól and efra hlut jólanna and narrates movement at the midpoint. In Þórleifur Jónsson's 1904 edited þáttr, the same story has a large feast and communal drinking, and later a visit for what remained of Jól, but does not supply those exact three expressions.
CONTEXTUAL
The episode belongs to a kings'-saga/þáttr story about Óláfr Haraldsson's emissary Þóroddr in Jamtaland and his exposure to a hostile local political plot. Excess drink elsewhere in the story helps expose that plot and enables the captives' escape. The Jamtaland setting, Christian-period royal narrative and editorial differences matter; it is not an independently observed pre-Christian rite.
MY INTERPRETATION
Guðni's edited branch offers strong literary evidence that Jól could be represented as a social period divided into portions. Þórleifur 1904 confirms a related sequence of drinking and a later move, but cannot be invoked to independently confirm the stronger mið jól wording.
NOT ESTABLISHED
A fixed total of Jól days or a numbered midpoint; a universally followed two-household pattern; a pagan or sacrificial obligation; verbatim agreement among all versions; independence of the standalone þáttr and incorporated Óláfs saga helga account.
FIND IT YOURSELF
Actually consulted: Guðni Jónsson (ed.), “Þórodds þáttr Snorrasonar,” Íslendinga sögur, chs. 2–3, edited Old Norse transcription at https://www.heimskringla.no/wiki/%C3%9E%C3%B3rodds_%C3%BE%C3%A1ttr_Snorrasonar (search Þeir mágar skyldu drekka hálf jól and Ok er kómu mið jól). Second actually consulted text: Þórleifur Jónsson (ed.), “Þórodds þáttr Snorrasonar,” Fjörutíu Íslendinga þættir (Reykjavík, 1904), chs. 2–3; https://heimskringla.no/wiki/Fj%C3%B6rut%C3%ADu_%C3%8Dslendinga_%C3%BE%C3%A6ttir:_%C3%9E%C3%B3rodds_%C3%BE%C3%A1ttr_Snorrasonar (search Þeir mágar drukku saman jólin and þat sem eftir var jólanna). Editorial source page identifies the 1904 volume; specific print pagination and Guðni printed collection volume not independently confirmed. Comparison identified: Heimskringla, Óláfs saga helga, ch. 141 in the Storm chapter numbering (identified by 1904 edition's introduction, not independently checked in this phase). English: new close rendering of Guðni's digital edited wording; no modern published English translation claimed inspected. Source ledger: SL-031-A–C.
—
CHRONOLOGIES
Represented: Early eleventh-century Jamtaland under the Christian king Óláfr Haraldsson. Composition/testimony: Thirteenth-century kings'-saga/þáttr literary transmission, not eyewitness testimony. Surviving witnesses: Later medieval kings'-saga and þáttr transmission; no individual manuscript image or manuscript-specific folio was examined.
VARIANTS AND DEPENDENCIES
A directly checked substantial editorial difference: Guðni has hálf jól / mið jól / efra hlut; Þórleifur Jónsson (1904) substitutes general togetherness and the remaining Jól. No specific medieval witness has been assigned as the origin of this variation; comparing two printed edited presentations is not a manuscript collation. Treat the þáttr and its Heimskringla narrative placement as one circulating episode, not two independent accounts. No manuscript apparatus inspected.